![]() ![]() She said she had not used her personal email to discuss any classified information.Ĭlinton said her server would remain private. The former secretary of state described her decision to rely exclusively on her private account as a matter of convenience and a way to avoid carrying two devices. But as criticism from Republicans mounted and Democratic allies started publicly pushing Clinton to address the matter, her team hastily arranged Tuesday's brief news conference. The clear front-runner for the Democratic nomination, Clinton had planned to spend March touting her work on women's issues and giving a handful of paid speeches before announcing her candidacy in early April.Ĭlinton tried to stick to that plan in the days after details of her email use became public. The controversy has upended Clinton's careful blueprint for the rollout of her 2016 presidential campaign. "I fully complied by every rule I was governed by," Clinton said in a 20-minute news conference that marked her first comments on the matter. In the face of a growing controversy over her use of a private email address and server, Clinton was defiant in insisting she had not violated any federal laws or Obama administration rules. ![]() (Richard Drew/AP) This article is more than 8 years old.īreaking her silence, Hillary Rodham Clinton conceded Tuesday that she should have used government email as secretary of state and acknowledged she had destroyed tens of thousands of emails in her private account that she described as personal in nature. It's unclear how much information he was giving to Western officials at the time the email was sent, Politico reports.Hillary Clinton answers questions at a news conference at the United Nations Tuesday. intelligence have been publicly acknowledged for years. Politico reports Kousa's contacts with U.S. "We will continue to redact that information and treat it with the highest level of confidentiality and sensitivity, and we would advise you to do the same." "Sources and methods of intelligence are among the most closely guarded information our government has," Gowdy wrote to Cummings. The State Department didn't immediately respond to Politico about the matter.Īccording to Politico, Cummings disclosed Sunday that the CIA hadn't requested the deletion of the source's name and didn't consider the information classified.Ĭummings declared that information undercut Gowdy's claim that Clinton had endangered national security by having such information on her private server and by forwarding the message to one of her aides.īut Gowdy responded to that challenge, saying he wanted to protect the source's identity, even if the CIA didn't. "The committee will not confirm the name in question is the alleged source.” "The State Department failed to redact a name in a subject line, so the committee took steps to remove this information so it was consistent with State Department's redaction of it in another subject line," Ware tells Politico. Cummings.īut the initial online email document was replaced with another version in which Kousa's name doesn't appear, Politico notes.īenghazi committee spokesman Jamal Ware blames the State Department for clearing the release of the initial email containing the spy's name. The email was released Sunday at the South Carolina Republican's discretion "so the American people could decide for themselves regarding concerns about sources and methods," Gowdy said in a statement atop a letter to the committee's ranking Democrat, Maryland Rep. ![]() The leak was first reported Monday by Yahoo news. Politico reports a Maemail posted Sunday on the House panel's website included the name of Mousa Kousa, a former Libyan government spy chief and foreign minister, in a subject line - but was redacted in the body of a forwarded message to Clinton. of State Hillary Clinton's private email inbox, reports say. A longtime CIA source's name apparently was accidentally leaked during a testy online exchange between House Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy and the ranking Democrat, Elijah Cummings, over the sensitivity of information in former Sec. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |